Global Benchmarks in behaviour competencies
is at best a fanciful thought.So much as it may make good selling story
for products that position around such differentiating offerings,they
hardly stand up to robust ,studied scrutiny.
First,the simple reasons why.
Globally our communities are varied and behaviour as response to the environments we grow in is typical to the environs in which mostly our learning,settling years are spent.We do learn on the boil as we grow and adapt behaviours to meet our challenges pronto,but our instinctive behaviour is initiated from our early growings.Our adaptive behaviour merely builds around our early essential way of doing things.
And I dont want to introduce the unending nature vs nurtured debate as another lead in this.Hopefully, I havent done so already!By chance ,for sure,and not design!!
Add to it the complexity of variant behaviours conditioned by multiplexed situations you would have a very complicated thread-ball.To pull out one single defining thread and call it the global benchmark would thus be an awfully complex task.
Impossible by most.
And I guess Leonid Hurwicz too can't get this in one ecosystem of prediction and call it a standard.The variety is so hugely complexed.
Which is the interesting part.
I bother "Leo" might get it if at all.So what?How disinteresting a solution to essentially a romantic challenge.No.No one has done this before.Never mind the claims!!
First,the simple reasons why.
Globally our communities are varied and behaviour as response to the environments we grow in is typical to the environs in which mostly our learning,settling years are spent.We do learn on the boil as we grow and adapt behaviours to meet our challenges pronto,but our instinctive behaviour is initiated from our early growings.Our adaptive behaviour merely builds around our early essential way of doing things.
And I dont want to introduce the unending nature vs nurtured debate as another lead in this.Hopefully, I havent done so already!By chance ,for sure,and not design!!
Add to it the complexity of variant behaviours conditioned by multiplexed situations you would have a very complicated thread-ball.To pull out one single defining thread and call it the global benchmark would thus be an awfully complex task.
Impossible by most.
And I guess Leonid Hurwicz too can't get this in one ecosystem of prediction and call it a standard.The variety is so hugely complexed.
Which is the interesting part.
I bother "Leo" might get it if at all.So what?How disinteresting a solution to essentially a romantic challenge.No.No one has done this before.Never mind the claims!!
No comments:
Post a Comment